Ankyrean Anguish - Aetolia-based RAGE

Aryanne · February 2014

Ingram said:

I rage at snugglies still being a present thing, and running into them.

I rage that I read this, agreed, thought about it for about 2 seconds, and am now petrified that I qualify as a snuggly

Rashar · February 2014

Definitely snuggly.

Elwyn · February 2014

Rashar said:

Definitely snuggly.

Rashar's a snuggly, just saying..../flees

Arbre · February 2014

Takes one to know one and all that.

Ashmer · February 2014

Arbre said:

Takes one to know one and all that.

Oh, drat. Now I've been caught in it too.

Ingram · February 2014

Aryanne said:

Ingram said:

I rage at snugglies still being a present thing, and running into them.

I rage that I read this, agreed, thought about it for about 2 seconds, and am now petrified that I qualify as a snuggly

You ain't one.

Rashar · February 2014

Rashar doesn't snuggle.

He makes strategic contact.

Periluna · February 2014

Rashar said:

Rashar doesn't snuggle.

He makes strategic contact.

If by "strategic contact" you mean "whine about no RP's then pounce for RP for about.. oh... 5 mins and then run away" then yeah.

/isn'tbitter

Rashar · February 2014

Wait what? I never.

Rowena · February 2014

Moderating myself. Potential flame bait.

Teani · February 2014

I rage at people starting false rumors about other characters. Doesn't matter what it is, but some rumors are hard to kill because there are those who will never go check with the source and hear the other side of the story. Sometimes it can even be dormant for RL months, and then it suddenly pops up again as a "by the way" in some conversation.

Minarael · February 2014

I cannot possibly agree enough with Teani's post.

Veovis · February 2014

Teani said:

I rage at people starting false rumors about other characters.

If the rumors are in-character why rage about it?

Ingram · February 2014

Could be OOC.

Like that @Veovis guy. Metagames for mudsex all the time. It's awful.

Veovis · February 2014

Ingram said:

Could be OOC.

Like that @Veovis guy. Metagames for mudsex all the time. It's awful.

You're pretty good @Ingram. Can't get enough.

Ingram · February 2014

I've had practice.

Teani · February 2014

@Veovis: Yeah, like Ingram said, it's OOC rumors about characters. Some people can't separate IC and OOC and if they hear something about a character through an OOC medium, they will change the way they think/interact around that character.

Veovis · February 2014

Teani said:

@Veovis: Yeah, like Ingram said, it's OOC rumors about characters. Some people can't separate IC and OOC and if they hear something about a character through an OOC medium, they will change the way they think/interact around that character.

Ahh. Yeah. That's annoying. I think we're all probably guilty of that to some extent (we're only human after all), but it's annoying all the same.

Xiuhcoatl · February 2014

I rage that people actually care about lore IC. Half of the lore you know OOC. How many characters actually know what happened at XYZ? The answer is like 1 or 2 AT MOST.

This game is suppose to be a midieval fantasy. Not a lore-sing-along-athon. Grab a mace, sect challenge. Alternatively, make the lore as it should be IC. WHATEVER THE UNICORN YOU SAY IT IS.

On a serious note, I do find it quiet strange that people would care about the truth IC. If you were to be 100% realistic, living memory would fade a lot of the past away so you'd only have what people say about it. IE, my grandpa told me that Enorian was founded by the pixies and Bloodloch by the imps and that's why they always fight. Would eventually be after a few generations, WE THE PIXIES OF ENORIAN CHALLENGE THE IMPS OF BLOODLOCH TO A DUEL TO THE DEATH. Why? Because nobody actually remembers what happened 100 years ago. You only have stories and maybe a few words on it. You'd have to be like a historian to make sense of it.