Just came to rip the bandaid off.Ardent hit the nail on the head in his rebuttal towards you, Illidan.
The problem is, as I see it, there a number of people on Shadow who simply do not take time or show the initiative to get better, or lead. There have been -numerous- times in which i've done lessers, majors, and even orreries with just myself and @Valorie, or with @Sryaen, and there will be 8+ shadow people actively online, but because people like Mjoll or Mazzion aren't around to lead them, they don't try. Actually, they do try, but they get trashed 2v4, 3v6, etc. If Mazz or Mjoll, or even Alela lately aren't leading stuff, objectives are often incredibly free.
It's a competence and willingness to participate problem vs an actual lack of numbers problem.
There is a lot to unpack in your post @Rhyot that just...is not right. While I'm sure there are times when Spirit has a huge number advantage during individual engagements at lessers, it's not constant. On top of that, there have been plenty of instances where Shadow looses to fairly even numbers and someone will run their mouth saying that Spirit brought a, quote, horde or that Spirit metagamed and pinged people on discord when neither happened.Allow me, mi amigo, to unpack this for you then. You are objectively incorrect on the point of it not being a constant. For the past year, it -has- been a constant. Even more so in the past 6 months. At any point in the day, when there is a lesser... it is almost always a 7+ event which quickly bursts to something around 10+ after a first contest. This is likely due to 'Oh we're winning and I can show up, get recognition for showing up for my city credits and not do anything but bash eld because we're double the numbers and it would be suicidal for Shadow to show up at a 10+ man lesser.'
On top of that, I know I have heard multiple times that Shadow web has a history of being...less than pleasant, especially when taking an L.
So yes, I think there is a bad sportsmanship problem here, but I don't think it's Spirit that has the problem.
I might be inclined to agree in other discussions - though tbf I think there's a lot to be said for people using 'tether tribalism' as a catch-all excuse not to engage in discourse. At least in this case, though, the peeve is a blatant falsehood or not representative of the reality of the situation. It's a culture issue. I'm literally watching that issue unfold in front of me via reading Rhyot's posts: some folks on Shadow tether actively deny reality or convey their complaints in a way that would not make me want to participate alongside them. Numbers are usually even. The organizations inside the tether have problems with encouraging participation and I'm sure there's a lot of angles that could be attacked at.Ardent said:It still counts as a game peeve if it's based on the forums right? I'm bored to tears of the us vs them mentality that jumps up every time a combat discussion happens. Honest peeve is brought up, gets dismissed and throw around because someone doesn't agree with it, turns into argument which devolves into tether tribalism. I don't care if you agree with me or that statement, it's what happens. Very rarely does someone from Spirit or Shadow agree with something someone from the other Tether says on the merit of what is said. If it does happen, there is someone who comes up behind said person and disregards it. You're obviously right about the numbers issues gentlemen and know exactly what the problem is. Have a nice day.
Perhaps because I was intentionally vague are you misunderstanding me, but there are people who do actually try, and then there are people who simply do not at all. Even worse, are the people that claim they have the means and knowhow to do better, but willfully choose not to while simultaneously complaining about skewed numbers when they hardly participate unless the roflstomp train happens to be going in full swing for them.Just came to rip the bandaid off.Not that I disagree with either of these comments. But wording it like that when people have tried kind of drives home people not wanting to try further when it gets looked at like that.
If Mazz or Mjoll, or even Alela lately aren't leading stuff, objectives are often incredibly free.
It's a competence and willingness to participate problem vs an actual lack of numbers problem.
I would personally say it's more of a learning curve issue of people who are used to calling vs people who haven't called before and typically follow calls. If I can't make a lesser I'll try and help a target order for them, all I can do is offer it though. If people are busy with multiple things and just trying to jump in a lesser and miss that and go off an order that isn't optimal they get stomped pretty hard. Give a second shot at that, same result, kind of pulls the gas out of wanting to go back and try.