Best Of

Re: Age of Dawn

@nola I think from your point of view you and the Daru are still trying to run the guild and its belief system as if neutrality still existed. Neutrality was done away with. It sucks, I loved being a neutral Druid who only cared if someone screwed with a forest. But it was done away with along with the whole druid guild. With their replacements the shamans, they got a new way of doing things. The Daru didn't. If I remember right Daru were one of the neutral guilds before. (Correct me if I'm wrong). But just because you've done things for a long time one way and fought for this right or that right, doesn't mean you shouldn't change. No one is trying to take rights from the Daru. They just want you to teach the idea of coming together to be stronger... Is that so bad?

Plato

0

Re: Tavern Talk (OT thread)

Just thinking of how this applies to myself. I realise that the combat aspect of the game has been so developed, compelling and enjoyable that it's turned me completely from RP to spending most of my time chatting OOCly on web/clan/tells (and becoming a full fledged pk whore). Seriously, people, it's that good. Give it a go!

Lim

2

Re: Age of Dawn

@alderic that's completely wrong. That was the old ideals of Sabelism that are being done away with. What's being kept is the ideals of coming together and worshiping/uniting all the spirit gods.
@Jensen What specifically would be wrong about it? Vamps have been overpowered for years. The shadow organizations have obviously been overpowered hince their immense popularity. What's wrong with the Spirit orgs now is that fact. No one even wants to try because they know they will just lose.

Plato

0

Re: Age of Dawn

I'm a lighter now and I agree with them, @Plato. Just because they're in the dark side, it's not because it's the best PK side - it's where RP took them. There's an ebb and flow. There was a point in time everyone tends to refer to as the Sibatti era where Duiran was the place to be and we annihilated everyone else. Now it's Spinesreach's time. As for @Ashmer, someone has to be the top combatant, now it's him. We (the lighters) have a lot of negatives in our playerbase itself that helps defeat our cause altogether, though I do see things beginning to improve a bit.

Basically, it's the Midnight Age. The darkies are supposed to be winning. That doesn't mean their classes are better (because they're not), they're just the main draw to the game. You want to change that? Change your org, don't ask for admin handouts. @Sibatti and co proved that that was possible once already.

Arbre

6

Re: Age of Dawn

oh and also, 'seems' unfair? Do you want to join the light? I'm betting no because you wouldn't be as powerful

Plato

0

Re: Age of Dawn

@Jensen‌
1) You just like the power where it is and do not want it to change
2) Vamps still OP... You go up against Ashmer and see who wins
3) What strengths? It's so weak no one wants to even join. The newbs we get 90% of the time end up going to shadow just cause they are better. End of story. Don't even get me started on the devoted 'spirit orgs' that have like a total of 4 combatants.
4) Power balance shifts? Pretty sure the power balance has been in shadow since I started playing over 10 rl years ago.
5) No I don't want an instant win. I do however want a game that's not 'if you want to kick butt and actually be good, go shadow'

Plato

0