Looking for more active discussion? Join our Discord at https://discord.gg/x2s7fY6
Ilyon
Comments
-
(Quote) No, you can't.
-
(Quote) While this option does indeed exist, I would advocate caution before taking on such a task - affliction classes are currently balanced around good tracking ability, the removal of which would require rather significant upgrades to make up f…
-
Not a fan of giving block to everyone, the rest looks great.
-
Actually, we can simplify that analysis even further, owing to the fact that we know that Demarcus is a townie (okay, it's not 100%-surefire proven, but in the lack of a second roleclaim, I think we can agree on it being true). So the options are:The anxiety change was not aimed at group combat, that's just a side effect.
Yeah, we're waiting for the fifth non-mafia member to (switch) vote to Macavity, or for the fourth mafia member to (switch) vote to Damonicus. No other way out of this.
Sounds like you've never played a limb class! Hit tracking to know when the limb will break is essential, working off the breaks alone is not enough.
Yeah, lycans / monks / templars / etc all have this same issue, it's not unique to Sentinels. Custom parry messages could be a nice convenience, but their lack is not anywhere close to being a significant issue, nor should it prevent anyone from par…Eh, it's easy to track, just do the same thing as with dodge messages (which behave in the same way).
Which is to say, if you want to wait for something, then you should remove your vote for the time being.
@Ciarelle - you do realize that if you are not mafia, then Lin is, and thus waiting is a spectacularly bad idea, right? We have two 4:4 trains, and the one with Dem…Okay, so let's see.
Damonicus: Macavity, Ciarelle, Toz, Trager
Macavity: Demarcus, Periluna, Ilyon
Not voted: Damonicus, Lin
The fast buildup of the original train and the reluctance in vote switching indicates that D…The damonicus train has been building up too fast, it is unlikely that he's mafia.
Vote: Macavity@Belgarion - the cantrip stuff certainly looks like a cool concept. My main worry there would be is that it feels kind of needlessly complicated - why not simply l…Correct, unless they hit whomever happens to be protected, we'll need to find a baddie in the next round or it's game over.
Hrm, actually it's probably game over in that case even if they do hit the protected guy.
Hrm, let's try that, then.
VOTE: Alexina
Huh, how are they getting a power role each round?
Good, good.
Hm, let's try this, then.
VOTE: Sarita
Finger of Suspicion.
Yeah, 'being inactive with a weird excuse' and 'voting nolynch' were both contributing factors for me. Sadly it didn't work out, but such is mafia. I'll also note that Sarita's withdrawn vote aside, I was the first one to vote for him, which isn't a…So, we went through the first round with a nolynch and no relevant information whatsoever. Now Aarbrok proposes a second nolynch, which would only help the mafia further and achieve nothing else either. I'm not buying the "didn't notice that it star…Wait what, why are you guys voting nolynch? In the standard mafia setup (which ours is very close too) a nolynch only favors the mafia, what is different here to make this not true for us?
Getting rid of inactives early on does sound like a plausible approach, yes. Waiting on the vote to see who they are.