Clouser was plenty dangerous with the new disturb-based unravel. Easily one of my toughest at that time. Thing is, even if tweak spam won't kill you quickly, cabalists force you to fight aggressively to have a chance to beat them. Not diagnosing …
In games where player interaction is limited to the point of a sword, sure, that makes sense.
In a game where animosity and the relationship with your enemy is something that is grounds for RP rather than instant …
ISent By: Belakai on 6/28/2005/21:09
I was curious if you would be interested in being a forum moderator
Sent By: Anfini on 4/27/2007/17:00
Yaaaaay.
Sent By: Rhelora on 6/05/2007/…
There's no way you need an automated offense for that. Just good aliases and practice.
I'm willing to bet the whole weaponry dependency issue is well known to the admin and I'm willing to bet they agree vampires s…
Where exactly did you see me say four is the magic number? More importantly, as tempting as the low-hanging-fruit of excuses for an ad hominem is, surely you can agree that - one, I have a stable and significant history of r…
Your entire argument is based on this being a matter of segregating the active from the inactive and culling the latter. I dislike repeating myself, but this is not the intent. It is not about punishment and reward. It is about consolidat…
Yeah, it runs that risk. Not changing it provides for the certainty of greeting newbies with sub-par organizations. You're drawing the line in the place you're comfortable, but if we're going to be backing out now, do the houses that already merg…
I don't think it's surprising that people don't want to lose their house. If they did, they could generally achieve that on their own power.
And, knowing that nobody wants to lose, I'm completely confident that no competition or arrangement…
I ignored that point, because it's been addressed before. No, it's not been proven. People are killing themselves to maintain activity. The second they no longer have an axe at their neck, you'll see this 'maintained activity' vanish.
4 was…
It's fine if all the people flock to one house. If it's a successful environment, it'll retain the numbers. If it isn't, it'll bleed members. In any event, the numbers will regulate themselves according to the organization's success at providing …
I think none of the 3 houses vying for survival want to have to make a deal or compromise to ensure their survival, hence why the 5 houses solution sounds perfectly lovely and stress free. Neither of the three is currently sure of their chances, …
Didn't realize you were a chick.
How you doin'?
See, if I were a mod, I'd totally graft this Lunare derail onto the Lunare thread and rescue the RAGE thread from IMMINENT DESTRUCTION.
I'd also have an explosion at my back and it'd be totally badass.